Justice for Iraq.

[Spaz59]

Iraqis Want Saddam's Old U.S. Friends on Trial
Tue January 20, 2004 10:46 AM ET

By Michael Georgy
BAGHDAD (Reuters) - If Iraqis ever see Saddam Hussein on trial, they want his former American allies shackled beside him.

"Saddam should not be the only one who is put on trial. The Americans backed him when he was killing Iraqis so they should be prosecuted," said Ali Mahdi, a builder.

"If the Americans escape justice they will face God's justice. They must be stoned in hell."

The United States continued to feel the backlash of its move to give Saddam prisoner of war status Tuesday as thousands of Iraqi protesters called for his execution.

Washington's move has thrown some doubt over his fate after Iraq's U.S.-backed Governing Council had said Saddam would be tried in a special tribunal by Iraqi judges.

His POW status means the former dictator, accused of sending thousands of Iraqis to mass graves, could have more rights than a war criminal.

In street interviews, Iraqis said Saddam must be tried by an Iraqi court prepared to hand down the death penalty and examine his ties to past U.S. governments.

The United States backed Saddam in his war with Iran in the 1980s. During that time, he also gassed an estimated 5,000 Kurds to death in the village of Halabja.

A few years later Washington began branding Saddam a tyrant and an enemy after his troops invaded oil-rich Kuwait in 1990.

"Saddam was a top graduate of the American school of politics," said Assad al-Saadi, standing with friends in the slum of Sadr city, formerly called Saddam City, a Shi'ite Muslim area oppressed by Saddam's security agents.

"My brother was an army officer who was executed. Saddam is a criminal and the Americans were his friends. We need justice so that we can forget the past."

Saddam was captured on December 13 hiding in a hole near his hometown of Tikrit. A month later the United States declared him a prisoner of war.
But his new POW status has only added to skepticism about American promises after toppling Saddam in April.

"The Americans and Saddam should face justice. Do you really think the Americans are going to put themselves on trial?" said Ali, a U.S.-trained policeman.

"Of course we hope the Americans and Saddam will face trial. But will it ever happen? I doubt
it."

http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=OKX1PCS1W2USWCRBAEOCF EY?type=worldNews&storyID=4168225&pageNumber=0

[Spaz59]

But I thought this whole war was about Justice for the Iraqis?

Don't tell me you've all gone chickenshit on me now.:scary:

[JBMoney]

We've been over this before. There's some kind of twisted logic in Libs heads that, as long as it supports your position, it's justified to argue that someone is wrong just because they're not following a policy from 20, 30, 40, whatever years ago.

You'll grant that the policy was wrong then, but for some reason it's a reason not to act differently now? As if institutional inconsistency is some sort of international crime.

I'll cover it for you again. Current administrations are not obliged to carry out the policies of previous administrations. If that were the case, why bother having elections.

Blah, blah, blah.... WHAT ABOUT RUMMY SHAKING HANDS WITH SADDAM!!! 20 years ago Rummy worked for Reagan Inc., now he works for Bush II Inc. Diplomats shake hands, that's one of the things they do best.

Word is that only a few years before WWII, the Brits were shaking hands, making treaties and giving land to the Germans. A few years later they're declaring War on him??? WTF is up with that?

[Spaz59]

Hey!:OOPS:

I'm not the Iraqi's calling for justice.

We liberated them and they want justice.

Nothing to do with me guv. Honest.