PDA

View Full Version : The hatred of America is the socialism of fools (a must read)


Television
01-09-03, 08:28 AM
Times Online
January 08, 2003

The hatred of America is the socialism of fools

Michael Gove

Confronting Yankee-phobia on the Left will be Tony Blair's toughest task yet
Tony Blair appears to have set himself his toughest task yet. Neither reforming public services nor maintaining economic stability compares in difficulty to the mission he took on yesterday. For a Labour politician to confront anti-Americanism is to set himself up in opposition to the dominant ideology of the contemporary Left.
Knocking America off its superpower pedestal has long supplanted taking control of the commanding heights of the economy as the idea which holds the Left together. Forget Clause Four. That was a dead red letter. It’s opposition to Uncle Sam which is the glue in the Left coalition, the brew which puts fire into bien-pensant bellies, the opium of radical intellectuals. And the crack in Osama bin Laden’s pipe.
Anti-Americanism provides the drumbeat for the protesters who march at every significant left-wing rally. Whether the protest is nominally against war, global capitalism or environmental degradation, the real enemy is Washington. Every significant Left intellectual, from Harold Pinter through Dario Fo to Gore Vidal and Noam Chomsky has made criticism of the American imperium his defining belief. But Yankee-phobia now extends far beyond the protest march and the academy.
The German Social Democrats and Greens put opposition to US foreign policy at the heart of their, successful, re-election strategy last autumn. The Liberal Democrats here have made criticism of US policy towards Iraq the single biggest dividing line between themselves and the Blair Government.
The cultural popularity of anti-Americanism, particularly among Britain’s intelligentsia, is striking. The surprise publishing hit of last year was Why do people hate America? by Ziauddin Sardar and Merryl Wyn Davies, a work which set out to reassure readers that hatred of America was more than a rising sentiment, it was a moral duty. The top of the UK bestseller list is Michael Moore’s Stupid White Men, a furious polemic against US foreign, domestic and economic policy by one of its own citizens.
The widespread prevalence of anti-Americanism, the cachet accorded to its advocates, the reflexive sniggering triggered by any favourable mention of America’s President, all make opposition to this trend unpopular. But vitally necessary. For Yankee-phobia is, at heart, a dark thing, a prejudice with ugly antecedents which creates unholy alliances. And, like all prejudices, it thrives on myths which will end up only serving evil ends.
It is a myth that America is a trigger-happy cowboy state over-eager to throw its weight around, a myth that America seeks to use its undoubted military power to establish an exploitative empire, and a myth that America thrives by impoverishing and oppressing other nations.
A trigger-happy starter of wars and provoker of enemies? The truth is that the US has been painstakingly slow to involve itself in foreign conflicts. It hung back from involvement in Bosnia and Kosovo until it was clear that Europe could not manage alone. It refrained from dealing properly with al-Qaeda when that network attacked US embassies in 1998 and, even after 9/11, it waited until a huge international coalition had been assembled before striking back. In Iraq, it refrained from finishing off President Saddam Hussein in 1991 out of deference to its Arab allies. And with North Korea, it has practised diplomacy in the face of nuclear provocation since 1994, out of respect for its regional allies. Even now, in dealing with the dangers posed by Iraq and North Korea, the diplomatic route is followed out of deference to others.
An imperial exploiter? The truth is that America seeks to disentangle itself from anything which smacks of neocolonial occupation. It is anxious to bring the boys back home from the Balkans and Afghanistan. The real criticism of weight is that the US should do more on the ground to help failed states rebuild, as it did in Japan and Germany after the Second World War.
Which takes us to the myth of America the locust state, the predator on the poorest nations of the Earth. The truth, as the US writer Charles Krauthammer has pointed out, is that America’s influence for good in suffering states is directly measurable in three very different examples. After the Second World War three devastated nations were divided. In each case one part of a culturally unified nation fell under America’s political influence. And in each case — South Korea versus North, West Germany as against East, Taiwan as opposed to Communist China — the territory which took the American path enjoyed greater freedom and prosperity.
Why then do the myths of America the Hateful take such powerful hold? Because anti-Americanism provides a useful emotional function which goes beyond logic and reaches deep into the darker recesses of the European soul. In centuries past those on the Left who wished to personalise their hatred of capitalism, who sought to make it emotionally resonant by fastening an envious political passion on to a blameless scapegoat people, embraced anti-Semitism. It was the socialism of fools. Which is what anti-Americanism is now.
It should not therefore be surprising that those on the populist Right who share the Left’s antipathy towards the US are those, like the Austrian Freedom Party or the French National Front, who are heirs of anti-Semitic traditions. Nor should it be remarkable that the other tie which binds these allies of new Left and old Right together, the thread linking those such as George Galloway and Jörg Haider, is their hostility to Israel.
Both America and Israel were founded by peoples who were refugees from prejudice in Europe. Europe’s tragedy is that prejudice has been given new life, in antipathy to both those states.

LINK note: Although this article is only a day old, it has to be obtained through the site's search feature, under "Socialism of Fools."
http://search.thetimes.co.uk/cgi-bin/ezk2srch?-aSTART#

gopsdragon
01-09-03, 04:45 PM
Excellent article.

Eddy's Geist
01-09-03, 05:34 PM
Agreed. This is an excellent article.

Gove has delivered some excellent points regarding the international communities perception of America. But these criticisms should be limited to to the international community and respective politicians. To criticize Michale Moore or Noam Chomsky or the protestors that attend left wing rallies is to completely ignore the one issue (imho) that makes America so great. The freedom of speech.. the freedom to castigate or congratulate the goverment for any and every real or imagined slight.

Gove might not like what Moore has written and that's his perojative. But to label him "anti american" is 180 degrees off base. Moore is as American as you or me or.. Gove for that matter. .

shotglass
01-09-03, 05:47 PM
I don't remember these protests going on when a liberal was in the White House. Or was I not paying attention. I see it more as anti-conservatism than anti-Americanism.

gopsdragon
01-09-03, 05:52 PM
Originally posted by shotglass
I don't remember these protests going on when a liberal was in the White House. Or was I not paying attention. I see it more as anti-conservatism than anti-Americanism.

Same thing shotty. They don't have to waste their time when they have one of their own in there. It's preaching to the choir. OOPS. Sorry, it's preaching to the coven.

jhans
01-09-03, 06:35 PM
Good article. I coulnd't have said it better.

anti-Americanism provides a useful emotional function which goes beyond logic and reaches deep into the darker recesses of the European soul. In centuries past those on the Left who wished to personalise their hatred of capitalism, who sought to make it emotionally resonant by fastening an envious political passion on to a blameless scapegoat people, embraced anti-Semitism. It was the socialism of fools. Which is what anti-Americanism is now.

Eddy, this article seems to tie in nicely with our discussion about Bin Laden's popularity. Whether it is the hatred of the Jews or the hatred of America this scapegoat tactic is a cheap excuse for those that have no other excuse for their failure.

shotglass
01-09-03, 10:00 PM
Excellent point, jhans. More blame the rich rhetoric.

Band Camp Productions
01-10-03, 11:22 AM
Originally posted by shotglass
Excellent point, jhans. More blame the rich rhetoric.

You mean they aren't responsible for all that is evil in the world?

Damn.

I guess my college edumucation hasn't taught me anything.

Eddy's Geist
01-10-03, 12:54 PM
Left wing protests? Oh yeah.. well.. if you count the WTO protests as left wing. That's how the media played it up anyhow. WTO protests contained thousands of regular working class joes who didn't want to see their jobs sent overseas.

Here's something to think about... the really liberal "liberals" IE: The scary ones. They hated Clinton. Saw him as closet conservative masquarading as a liberal. Funny... I guess it's just where you stand.

GOPS brings up a really interesting angle. Anti Conservative. I haven't looked at it from this perspective but it might explain much of the divide that's currently in vogue here. In my opinion... I'd say that the liberal dislike of conservatives would be driven by the social and religious policies and not by the economic policies.


Originally posted by shotglass
I don't remember these protests going on when a liberal was in the White House. Or was I not paying attention. I see it more as anti-conservatism than anti-Americanism.

gopsdragon
01-10-03, 01:09 PM
Originally posted by Eddy's Geist
GOPS brings up a really interesting angle. Anti Conservative. I haven't looked at it from this perspective but it might explain much of the divide that's currently in vogue here. In my opinion... I'd say that the liberal dislike of conservatives would be driven by the social and religious policies and not by the economic policies.

Eddy,

I have a feeling you and I could have a good conversation on this topic, but that would probably be a different thread.

The one thing I would say is that there is a difference between conservatives and libertarians (though the media doesn't draw the distinction because they both lean right) and the conservatives do put some limits that coincidentally agree with some leftist policies on economics.

Hence a left-winger at WTO is protesting a liberal like Clinton but over economic reasons and not social (because he is still a social liberal). At that point (World Trade) Clinton overlaps with the Libertarian Republicans and not the Conservatives, but the American public has been led to believe corporate truth is conservative truth and they protest Clinton's "conservatism" on this issue.

Sure you'll want to discuss more...

Eddy's Geist
01-10-03, 11:57 PM
Ah damn, do we have to? ;)


Originally posted by gopsdragon


Sure you'll want to discuss more...

Butterlugs
01-11-03, 11:41 PM
One half the participants in Seattle were kids with nothing to do rrom the afluent suburbs and the other half were professional protestors, kids who see this as significant but not smart enough to see when they are duped.

Elliot Gould in the movie "Getting Straight" summed it up, its all about getting sex, and that insight is 30 years old.

This was an excellent article.

Pistol Pete
01-14-03, 03:45 AM
Very to the point article.
Here's a little retrospect. In high school, I was sort of an enigma (like I'm not now;) ). Anyway, we had every sort of social type to be had:Socials, rednecks, hippies, Nazis, jocks, geeks (they were called "spaz"), no catagory people, communists, and me. I got along with the rednecks that I had gone to school with since kindergarten, and the hippies who were just laid back. I got along with the Nazis because they were straight A students and could carry on a coherent conversation without rambling off somewhere. I got along with the geeks because they were smarter than me and I was always learning cool science things from them. The socials were stuck up so I didn't give a damn about them. Jocks?..well.

The ones who couldn't figure me out were the communists. These people carried their little Mao Red Books and wore black armbands to protest the Vietnam War and all that shit. They were members of the SDS, and Hanoi Jane was their wet dream. They approached me several times trying to get me to join them because they saw I liked the hippies and wore biker clothes. Bikers hated, and still hate communists (which they knew quite well). I supported the war against the Reds and that just didn't make sense to them. How could I hang out with hippies and want to kill communists? It's rather a no brainer to me: The hippies weren't violent or un-American.

The point is......I forgot, but you get the idea. ;) The left is screwed up, in all ways. Not a brain cell or original thought between them. After 100 million dead for their cause, it's best to leave them on the ash heap of history and go on. If they would only breed themselves out of existence. :)