Merch
12-25-05, 12:56 PM
When serious subjects arise, perhaps one or two replies make sense. But it isn't too long before responses degenerate, which is what discourages me about participating. I'm 73 years old and I can't follow some of your hip thought patterns. For instance, on the Condi thread I posted, JB responds, "booyah.."
Now, somebody seems to know what 'booyah" means, because it starts a whole chain of inanities: Glockmail "Oh, God. I can't breathe;" then RicardoHead (with that tongue hanging out) adds, "she doesn't have any staining on those undergarments."
Do you hip characters think you're exercising freedom of speech by talking about our Secretary of State's underpants? Why I'm so upset about this is that I expected someone to understand what's happening and help fight these eggheads, media moguls and other lefties who believe they can float above the consequences they bring down on our freedoms by virtue of their wealth.
But just as I'm often in the dark about the cute little jibes you chatter in, I'm beginning to think that, thanks to the dimunition of educational backgrounds between our generations, you can't follow my thought patterns.
I'd like to believe that some of my experience is worth posting. But then, anything I bring up gets drowned in a sea of inside jokes.
You youngsters don't have the slightest idea of what's driving cultural change, do you? (answer: post-modernistic control of today's political discourse.)
Here's a test--If you think you can still think, try and follow this:
First, there's a link about controlling the discourse from Clinton's labor secretary, Robert B. Reich, about the way a debate is framed: http://www.getamericaworking.org/other_surplus.htm I got this from the keywords "sets the boundaries" [of political] discourse.
WHERE THE HELL DO YOU CUTSIE KIDS (who respond to threads by posting stuff that might be seen above urinals) THINK POLITICAL CORRECTNESS COMES FROM? It comes from the linguistics and social science departments of left wing universities. I know, I recently (2002) got my MA in neuropsychology from a graduate school in San Francisco full of ultra-leftists. And guess what PC's doing to your freedom of speech! I'm seeng that not exercising it has reduced your vocabularies to "trendiod" chatter where there might have been thoughtful discourse.
For instance, the left now makes all conservatives insist they are not "questioning anyone's patriotism." Oh heaven f***ng forbid we should question John Kerry's, Ted Kennedy's, Chuck shumer's; Harry Ried's; Barbara Boxer's; D**K Durban's patriotisms!
Well guess what? I maintain that if I have any freedom of speech left, I can insist that these jerks are totally unpatriotic. Kerry gets up and says our fighting men break into Iraq homes and terrorize little children. I say that gives aid and comfort to the enemy. Then some Democrat says that I can't question Kerry's freedom of speech. Don't I have the freedom of speech to question Kerry's, Kennedy's, Shumer's, Ried's, Boxer's, and D**K Durban's trying the damnedest to have us lose the war on terror. No, I really don't question their patriotisms--what's to question? They don't have any. They'd sell this country to the United Nations and World Court in a blink!
25 years ago, I was in a debate with a leftist and mentioned that Democrat Administrations got us in all wars in the 20th centuary: WWs I & II, Korean, and Vietnam--and the last 2 they left for Republicans to clean up.
Well, he absolutely blew up at me and shouted, "YOU CAN'T SAY THAT! THAT'S NOT FAIR! ANYONE WHO SAYS THAT IS NOT WORTH EVEN TALKING TO!" There we go: My freedom of speech doesn't count. Democrats either make the rules or rewrite the rules by temper tantrum (maybe I'm having one now--but it's about time). When are we Republicans going to realize what's happening to our freedoms of expression, AND our use of language. We conservatives are being bullied out of our rights by sanctimony and tantrum.
Now, somebody seems to know what 'booyah" means, because it starts a whole chain of inanities: Glockmail "Oh, God. I can't breathe;" then RicardoHead (with that tongue hanging out) adds, "she doesn't have any staining on those undergarments."
Do you hip characters think you're exercising freedom of speech by talking about our Secretary of State's underpants? Why I'm so upset about this is that I expected someone to understand what's happening and help fight these eggheads, media moguls and other lefties who believe they can float above the consequences they bring down on our freedoms by virtue of their wealth.
But just as I'm often in the dark about the cute little jibes you chatter in, I'm beginning to think that, thanks to the dimunition of educational backgrounds between our generations, you can't follow my thought patterns.
I'd like to believe that some of my experience is worth posting. But then, anything I bring up gets drowned in a sea of inside jokes.
You youngsters don't have the slightest idea of what's driving cultural change, do you? (answer: post-modernistic control of today's political discourse.)
Here's a test--If you think you can still think, try and follow this:
First, there's a link about controlling the discourse from Clinton's labor secretary, Robert B. Reich, about the way a debate is framed: http://www.getamericaworking.org/other_surplus.htm I got this from the keywords "sets the boundaries" [of political] discourse.
WHERE THE HELL DO YOU CUTSIE KIDS (who respond to threads by posting stuff that might be seen above urinals) THINK POLITICAL CORRECTNESS COMES FROM? It comes from the linguistics and social science departments of left wing universities. I know, I recently (2002) got my MA in neuropsychology from a graduate school in San Francisco full of ultra-leftists. And guess what PC's doing to your freedom of speech! I'm seeng that not exercising it has reduced your vocabularies to "trendiod" chatter where there might have been thoughtful discourse.
For instance, the left now makes all conservatives insist they are not "questioning anyone's patriotism." Oh heaven f***ng forbid we should question John Kerry's, Ted Kennedy's, Chuck shumer's; Harry Ried's; Barbara Boxer's; D**K Durban's patriotisms!
Well guess what? I maintain that if I have any freedom of speech left, I can insist that these jerks are totally unpatriotic. Kerry gets up and says our fighting men break into Iraq homes and terrorize little children. I say that gives aid and comfort to the enemy. Then some Democrat says that I can't question Kerry's freedom of speech. Don't I have the freedom of speech to question Kerry's, Kennedy's, Shumer's, Ried's, Boxer's, and D**K Durban's trying the damnedest to have us lose the war on terror. No, I really don't question their patriotisms--what's to question? They don't have any. They'd sell this country to the United Nations and World Court in a blink!
25 years ago, I was in a debate with a leftist and mentioned that Democrat Administrations got us in all wars in the 20th centuary: WWs I & II, Korean, and Vietnam--and the last 2 they left for Republicans to clean up.
Well, he absolutely blew up at me and shouted, "YOU CAN'T SAY THAT! THAT'S NOT FAIR! ANYONE WHO SAYS THAT IS NOT WORTH EVEN TALKING TO!" There we go: My freedom of speech doesn't count. Democrats either make the rules or rewrite the rules by temper tantrum (maybe I'm having one now--but it's about time). When are we Republicans going to realize what's happening to our freedoms of expression, AND our use of language. We conservatives are being bullied out of our rights by sanctimony and tantrum.